Skip to main content
The worst tragedy that can ever happen to a person is being without a vision. Being without sight is doesn't implies being without vision. Fanny J Crosby, who suffered blindness from infancy as a result of a doctor's negligence realised this. Her heart saw for her, and she made maximum impact, she composed over 9,000 hymns without sight, but with vision.
It is vision that gets you where you need to be. Vision sets your propeller to move at maximum speed.
For so many people, they just maze around life with nothing they intend to achieve, be, or even do- an OS set to mediocrity.
A person with vision sees beyond the present; a person with vision won't just accept anything or any situation that presents itself, but rather make use of the situation present.

Ask yourself: what is it you want? Where do you want to be in the next five years, probably ten? Who do you want to be in the nearest future?
These questions will help set your vision statement, then write it down, in paper and in your heart, and run with it.

Don't forget, a person without sight is not the same as the person without vision.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Break The Limit

If your life were a book, and you were the author, how will you want your story to be written?

LESSONS FROM THE ANT

The Ants have always been a pointer to the way-to-living for human. Their lifestyle has always amazed man. Though little, feeble creatures as they seem and appear, they are loaded with lessons. Little wonder the proverbs gives the counsel: "go to the ants, thou sluggard; consider her ways and be wise". The ant teaches wisdom, which is learned by observation—lesson from the ants. #1- Activity with foresight

Building Capacity

The teen and youth ages are transitory periods. The adulthood is dependent on them and the childhood look forward to them. Major changes occur that shapes one during this period. Decisions and choices during this period are key too. The parable of the talents illustrates a scenario of three servants- their ages not told. They were given talents which can be likened to an investment. The spotlight is on the fact that they were given according to their "ability" and not "piety." A mentor once said they were given to capacity. If piety were a consideration, the servant who ended up with one talent should have had the most: he was pious; he feared his master the most  and wouldn't want to offend him in any way; but he hadn't capacity worth investing more than one talent. The above is an evidence that proves the fact that nobody is willing to invest much in anybody without capacity, enough to contain. The amount of content is dependent on the capacity of ...