Skip to main content
TIME SHIFT
Time shift like the name implies is an alteration in the equality of events over a specified time frame.

A scenario: two students starting the first year in the same school at the same time. They passed through the same lecture, class work, test and exam. It is expected of them that by the end of 12 years in the school, they both graduate, but they didn't. Something happened, time shift. While the first student was busy using spare time to acquire knowledge and prepare for exams over the years, the other student was more engaged in worthless activities; he had an extra year to round up for the next level. There was a time shift. Normally, they were meant to be at the same level, but it now seem as if the former started before the later.

Time shift does not always have a negative effect. Sometimes it happens due to inconsistencies, or misconduct, and may not be bad.

Whichever way, do not let time shift be against you.

Reference: Mr. Johnson Abbaly
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Break The Limit

If your life were a book, and you were the author, how will you want your story to be written?
3 comments
Read more

LESSONS FROM THE ANT

The Ants have always been a pointer to the way-to-living for human. Their lifestyle has always amazed man. Though little, feeble creatures as they seem and appear, they are loaded with lessons. Little wonder the proverbs gives the counsel: "go to the ants, thou sluggard; consider her ways and be wise". The ant teaches wisdom, which is learned by observation—lesson from the ants. #1- Activity with foresight
Post a Comment
Read more

Building Capacity

The teen and youth ages are transitory periods. The adulthood is dependent on them and the childhood look forward to them. Major changes occur that shapes one during this period. Decisions and choices during this period are key too. The parable of the talents illustrates a scenario of three servants- their ages not told. They were given talents which can be likened to an investment. The spotlight is on the fact that they were given according to their "ability" and not "piety." A mentor once said they were given to capacity. If piety were a consideration, the servant who ended up with one talent should have had the most: he was pious; he feared his master the most  and wouldn't want to offend him in any way; but he hadn't capacity worth investing more than one talent. The above is an evidence that proves the fact that nobody is willing to invest much in anybody without capacity, enough to contain. The amount of content is dependent on the capacity of ...
Post a Comment
Read more